Tuesday, April 21, 2026

Ronald Searle: Strength Through Joy

Strength through joy?


I suppose Ronald Searle did indeed give his drawing of a wicked St. Trinian's girl flipping over her teacher the title of Unarmed Combat—twice, it seems—and that certainly describes the action well enough. But that is not how it appeared in print.


The titles of Searle drawings were generally afterthoughts. In his classic collection Souls in Torment, as promising a name for a cartoon book as one could hope to find in 1953, the present work is one of three drawings under the alternative heading Strength Through Joy.

The term "unarmed combat" actually appears as part of a caption on the page opposite. Thus, grouping these three drawings under an Unarmed Combat heading would have detracted from the caption on the following page. At least, that's a conjecture of what went on, and why Searle abandoned his presumptive title for this drawing when it was published in a book even though it fit perfectly.

The signature appears to be later than 1953 by more than a decade. Searle must have signed it whenever the drawing eventually left his studio.
Ronald Searle's signature


In 1991, this piece was offered by London dealer Chris Beetles. Despite Beetles noting the publishing history, the title he listed is the one that Searle wrote on the work. After all, it is a better title. 

At auction, many a tempting work seems reasonably priced before the bidding gets underway.

Ronald Searle
Chiswick Auctions listing accessed March 21, 2026, ten days before the sale

Ronald Searle
Chiswick Auctions item description




And yet it sells on March 31 at Chiswick Auctions for more than twice the high estimate.



Here it is on the printed page as one of a trio of Strength Through Joy drawings. On the opposite page is "Some little girl didn't hear me say 'unarmed combat'." The captioned cartoon shows an earlier version of Searle's signature.
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-T3RcLoQuSZA/TrHj7rZjIFI/AAAAAAAAX7k/-SmvpXssYq0/s1600/Searle11.jpg








05251

Monday, April 20, 2026

My Entry in The New Yorker Cartoon Caption Contest #987

In The New Yorker Cartoon Caption Contest #987 from the issue of April 20, 2026, a pair of dogs look up at giant moon that is in the form of a cat's head. The dog on the right speaks. My submission is below. The drawing is by Christopher Weyant.

"Don't just sit there—howl."



This caption didn't sit well:
"I refuse to see anything but a man in the moon."




05250

Sunday, April 19, 2026

Alain [Daniel Brustlein]: Self-Portrait

Daniel Brustlein (1904-1996) was known to readers of The New Yorker as the cartoonist Alain. His signature collection is Alain's Steeplechase (1957). A self-portrait of his executed in oil on paper and sold on eBay early in 2020 is signed simply Brustlein.

The self-portrait shows the aritist surrounded by his paintings. The studio floor has tiles in a checkerboard pattern. The painter leaves the forms in an unresolved blur, and we are not sure whether we have quite seen him or not.





Daniel Brustlein's signature

The work is framed.

Alain [Daniel Brustlein]
eBay listing ended February 15, 2020


Alain [Daniel Brustlein]
eBay item descritpion


The work sold for a best offer somewhere less than $799.99.

[End of eBay listing]

Here, for comparison, is a photographic image of the artist. He definitely captured somthing of himself.
https://www.danielbrustlein.com/biography

This is his Wikipedia portrait:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Brustlein

Curiously, on the back dust cover to The New Yorker Album of Drawings 1925-1975, he is referred to as "Daniel Alain," but nowhere else does this combination of name and pseudonym appear in print. 
The New Yorker Album of Drawings 1925-1975
Detail of rear dust jacket



You may wonder why I sometimes archive and hold on to eBay listings for years before proceeding to post them. I wonder as well.




05249

Saturday, April 18, 2026

Penny Sibson's Copy of Where the WIld Things Are by Maurice Sendak

Penny Sibson was a book publicist who worked for a number of houses, including the Bodley Head, a London imprint of Penguin Random House. A copy of Maurice Sendak's Where the Wild Things Are from her personal library is dedicated to her by the author. He included a drawing of the wild thing Moishe, whom Sendak closely identified with. The book is available from Book Box London.











Maurice Sendak
AbeBooks listing accessed April 18, 2026


Maurice Sendak
AbeBooks item description

Maurice Sendak
AbeBooks bibliographic details





05248

Friday, April 17, 2026

Annals of Censorship: Patrick Nagel's Tracy Vaccaro on Bluesky

Maybe censorship is too strong a word here. The Adult Content label is more of a bothersome extra step to prevent supposedly sensitive eyes from viewing supposedly sensitive content. The "sensitive content" remains viewable on the Bluesky social media site.


I saw and photographed a Patrick Nagel piece at a Heritage Auctions Manhattan preview of the Illustration Art sale last week and subsequently posted it:


Patrick Nagel's illustration on canvas of Tracy Vaccaro in a polka dot dress or wrap is certainly sexy and, I'll even grant, somewhat erotic—it has indisputable partial nudity. So is it adult content? To Bluesky, yes. I personally don't think it would cause harm to innocent minds.

Google, to be sure, certainly has given me no pushback over my posts here on Blogger over these past fifteen years. From each of my blog posts, I go on to create content for a number of social media sites. On X, a post of mine may represent some of the tamer content these days. Pinterest, when the site censors me, eliminates the posts it consider objectionable entirely. That hasn't happened there for the Nagel, at least not yet. Facebook, Instagram, Threads, Tumblr, and Mastodon have pretty much left me to do as I please. The same for Counter Social, which I have avoided using for technical reasons. It is Bluesky that places a warning label on some of my more risque content but does not delete it. That is what the site did here, almost immediately after I posted the Nagel, no doubt via bot.


Clicking on the label leads to the big reveal:


The Adult Content label's wording "Does not include nudity" confuses me a bit. I assume it is chiefly the nudity that makes this Adult Content.


Here it is, the same post, now labeled on Bluesky as "Sexually Suggestive" and, again, "Does not include nudity."

Bluesky allowed me to appeal the Sexually Suggestive label, which I did as a matter of course.

My appeal consisted of just two words. I don't consider artistic nudity to be automatically adult content. But then, it isn't my app.

Is this a contradiction? How did the image change from "Sexually Suggestive" to "Non-sexual?" Did the labels change with my appeal?


Apparently, they did. Artistic nudes are classified as "non-sexual" on the site. That's not strictly correct either but, hey, it's Bluesky's playground.



The Bluesky post in question may be seen here. 


But, wait! No sooner did my appeal get heard than the process started over with my Bluesky post of Ronald Searle's City Bird which was on the blog Wednesday of this week.


https://bsky.app/profile/docnad.bsky.social/post/3mjni5faauk24


So here we go again . . . 









05247