Saturday, December 10, 2011

Gerald Scarfe: Oliver Twisted

The December 6 Interiors sale at Christie's South Kensington featured two lots by British caricaturist Gerald Scarfe, who ranks among his chief artistic  influences Ronald Searle and Walt Disney.

Gerald Scarfe (b.1936) 
'I don't want anymore!' 

signed 'Gerald Scarfe' (upper left) and inscribed as titled (lower centre)

pen and black ink, unframed 
6½ x 9¾ in. (16.5 x 24.8 cm.); Eight unframed cartoons by the same hand; and Two unframed cartoons by other hands (11)

Price Realized 

    £2,125
  • ($3,315)
  • Sales totals are hammer price plus buyer’s premium and do not reflect costs, financing fees or application of buyer’s or seller’s credits.
Estimate
    £800 - £1,200
  • ($1,250 - $1,874)

Sale Information

Sale 3280 Lot 430


6 December 2011 
London, South Kensington 


Special Notice

Artist's Resale Right ("droit de Suite"). If the Artist's Resale Right Regulations 2006 apply to this lot, the buyer also agrees to pay us an amount equal to the resale royalty provided for in those Regulations, and we undertake to the buyer to pay such amount to the artist's collection agent.
http://www.christies.com/lotfinder/gerald-scarfe-i-dont-want-anymore/5513152/lot/lot_details.aspx?from=salesummary&intObjectID=5513152&sid=24b82c8e-5881-4d02-98aa-4933e644c3a2

Gerald Scarfe (b. 1936) 
The busy penguin 

inscribed 'For/Christopher/Happy Birthday/27th June 1989/To a new era!' (centre right)
pen and black ink and watercolour with touches of bodycolour 
32 5/8 x 23 in. (83 x 58.5 cm.) 

Price Realized

    £875
  • ($1,365)
  • Sales totals are hammer price plus buyer’s premium and do not reflect costs, financing fees or application of buyer’s or seller’s credits.
Estimate
    £800 - £1,200
  • ($1,250 - $1,874)

Sale Information

Sale 3280 Lot 434
Christie's Interiors 
6 December 2011
London, South Kensington 
Special Notice
Artist's Resale Right ("droit de Suite"). If the Artist's Resale Right Regulations 2006 apply to this lot, the buyer also agrees to pay us an amount equal to the resale royalty provided for in those Regulations, and we undertake to the buyer to pay such amount to the artist's collection agent.
168

Friday, December 9, 2011

Fantasia Art from "The Nutcracker Suite"

On December 14, Bonhams will be offering these two works from Tchaikovsky's "The Nutcracker Suite" segment of Walt Disney's Fantasia (1940). The first is a vibrant pastel study on black paper of the Russian Dance. The second is a multi-cel set up of snowflakes, probably on a master background.


Sale 19431 - Entertainment Memorabilia including Animation Art, 14 Dec 2011
California, Los Angeles
 


Lot No: 4387
A Walt Disney storyboard from Fantasia
1940, pastel on black, depicting thistles dancing the Russian Dance in a high-kicking Cossack style from the Nutcracker Suite section of the film, matted.
7 1/2 x 10 1/2in within mat
Estimate: US$1,000 - 1,500
December 14, 2011: Sold for US$1,500 inclusive of Buyer's Premium  

http://www.bonhams.com/usa/auction/19431/lot/4387/


Lot No: 4398
A Walt Disney celluloid from Fantasia
1940, gouache on celluloid, the multi-cel set-up of the snow fairies from the The Nutcracker Suite sequence in the film, applied to a watercolor background that was most likely used in the film.
10 x 12 1/2in
Estimate: US$600 - 800
December 14, 2011: Sold for US$3,125 inclusive of Buyer's Premium  






"Nutcracker Suite" - Fantasia 1940 

Video modified November 24, 2012





Note: My last Disney post dating from Walt's birthday is here.

167

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Addams Family Tree

On Saturday at 1 p.m., Illustration House will offer 76 lots of illustration art, the penultimate one being this design for a dinner invitation.  Charles Addams has decorated the Christmas tree with bizarre ornaments in the shape of Addams Family heads. The illustration is signed and dated 1979. The festive dinner was held on Friday, December 21. The lot is accompanied by a printed dinner invitation with signatures of the attendees including illustrator Constantin Alajálov.
It's hard to say whether this simple Addams drawing will reach the $5,000 to $7,000 estimate. Certainly many collectors seek out original artwork with the Addams Family characters and this has them in abundance, at least above the neck.


Lot 75Charles Addams1912-1988x
xChristmas tree with Addams Family characters as ornaments.x
xIllustration for dinner invitation;
Ink on paper, 7 x 5", initialed lower right and signed along left edge
x
xEstimate: $5,000 - 7,000x
xThe work is accompanied by the dinner invitation on which the drawing was reproduced.x
xCondition - Good overall: three creases in paper; tape residue; light foxing throughout printed menu; paper is not archival; framed.x
xAmong the signatures is that of Constantine Alajalov, a major contributor of covers to the Saturday Evening Post and The New Yorker.


January 25, 2015 Update:  This piece was sold at Swann Galleries on January 22, 2015 with a much lower estimate.



Hammer price $2000



Note:  My previous post on Charles Addams was published on Halloween.  You could have guessed that, right?

0166

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Book Review: Mockingjay (2010) by Suzanne Collins

Mockingjay (2010)
Suzanne Collins

The final entry in Suzanne Collins's trilogy The Hunger Games is at least as depressing as the first two books. She still has some good ideas, and she cleverly spares us a third round in the arena (sort of), but it seems clear early on that Katniss Everdean has to choose between the lesser of two evils--the Capitol and the Rebels--and that once again no really good outcome can be expected. There is an ingenious plot twist at the book's climax to resolve some of this conflict, but all in all I think the series went on for too long and was too bleak. I realize that children today are exposed to very dark versions of, for example, Batman, James Bond, and any number of comic book heroes as compared with my generation, and that this gloom is supposedly justified by the terrifying world we now live in, as if it hadn't always been terrifying. Nevertheless, I feel there is very little reward for following Katniss's adventures to the dismal end. Worse, the series seems to decline with each book.

Current Hollywood plans call for splitting this final book into two movies a la Harry Potter. That's fine in itself, but they might think about lightening up the tone toward the end if they don't want to end up with a serious downer. J. K. Rowling, after all, considered killing off Ron Weasley but reconsidered. Suzanne Collins went ahead with her dark ending, but I can't imagine too many readers of any age are happy with the conclusion to this book.



Note:  My brief review of Catching Fire, the second book in The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins, can be found here.

0165

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

The Elizabeth Taylor Diamond

This auction of the Elizabeth Taylor Diamond supposedly will be what everyone's talking about this week. The famous diamond, which was purchased for the actress by husband Richard Burton, is set as a ring. This was formerly known as the Krupp diamond. It's purchase price was $305,000 in 1968. It is 33.19 carats and potentially internally flawless. The estimate of $2,500,000 to $3,500,000 strikes me as a potentially low estimate range.



THE ELIZABETH TAYLOR DIAMOND
A DIAMOND RING
Set with a cut-cornered rectangular-cut diamond, weighing approximately 33.19 carats, flanked on either side by a tapered baguette-cut diamond, mounted in platinum
With report 1132411262 dated 9 May 2011 from the Gemological Institute of America stating that the diamond is D color, VS1 clarity; accompanied by a working diagram indicating that the clarity may be potentially internally flawless

Accompanied by a supplemental letter from the Gemological Institute of America stating that the diamond has been determined to be a Type IIa diamond. Type IIa diamonds are the most chemically pure type of diamond and often have exceptional optical transparency. Type IIa diamonds were first identified as originating from India (particularly from the Golconda region) but have since been recovered in all major diamond-producing regions of the world. Among famous gem diamonds, the 530.20 carat Cullinan I and the 105.60 carat Koh-i-noor are examples of Type IIa

Accompanied by a hardbound Monograph from the Gemological Institute of America, featuring additional photography, data collection charts and gemological research, attesting to the rarity and prestige of the Elizabeth Taylor Diamond 

Estimate 

    $2,500,000 - $3,500,000

    Price Realized December 13, 2011

      $8,818,500
    • Sales totals are hammer price plus buyer’s premium and do not reflect costs, financing fees or application of buyer’s or seller’s credits.
    Sale Information

Sale 2623 Lot 80


13 December 2011 

New York, Rockefeller Plaza 

Special Notice

Please note that the copyright, and any and all associated intellectual property and other rights for this item are exclusively retained by the Trustees of the Estate of Elizabeth Taylor.
My memory is of Elizabeth's Taylor's other more famous diamond ring, featuring the Taylor-Burton Diamond, which was an astonishing 69 carats.   Burton purchased this one from Cartier, purportedly for $1.1 million. It was featured in the "Here's Lucy" episode of September 14, 1970 in which Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton, playing themselves, memorably appeared on Lucille Ball's show. Perhaps predictably, the ring got stuck on Lucy's finger.

After the couple's divorce, this diamond was sold in 1978 for $5,000,000. It is not a part of the present sale.

TV Guide, September 5-11, 1970
http://www.dameelizabethtaylor.com/tv_70s.html

Note:  My previous jewelry post is here.

164

Monday, December 5, 2011

What Did Walt Sign?

Walt Disney was born on this date in Chicago in 1901.


On December 14, Bonhams is offering this vintage drawing of Minnie and Mickey Mouse signed Walt Disney. Disney's work signatures are difficult, because while many are authentic, many others were signed by secretaries and other studio employees. In addition, he put his signature to much uncredited artwork done by studio artists, which is what I assume happened here. In the convention of Bonhams listings, all Walt Disney Studios work is described as Walt Disney, with no distinction made between the man and the Studios. Unfortunately, the auction listing says very little about the signature nor does it reveal anything about the artwork, which is crude and amateurish.




Sale 19431 - Entertainment Memorabilia including Animation Art, 14 Dec 2011
California, Los Angeles
 

Lot No: 4378
A Walt Disney watercolor of Minnie and Mickey Mouse
1930s, watercolor on paper, signed lower right Walt Disney, matted and framed.
Provenance: Sotheby's June, 1990, lot 111
3 1/4 x 4 1/2in

Estimate: US$500 - 700

December 14, 2011:  Sold for US$2,375 inclusive of Buyer's Premium 


This artwork makes no sense as a piece of Walt Disney Studios artwork dating from the 1930's. It's very sloppy and not up to the Disney standard of the time. For comparison below is a newspaper comic strip collection dating from 1931 with cover artwork on the identical subject. It was published by David McKay Co. and is credited as the first American Disney comic book. By comparison, the signed piece above doesn't look professional at all. Could it be a fan's artwork? A studio apprentice's?

http://www.comicvine.com/mickey-mouse-series-no-1/37-173497/

Note:  You can read my latest Disney post here.

163

Sunday, December 4, 2011

Krazy Sunday

Illustration House offers this original art for a Krazy Kat Sunday strip in its December sale. At first I thought the estimate was on the high side, but many Krazy Kat Sunday pages have indeed been selling in this range and higher. Krazy Kat may never have been the most popular strip, but many aficionados consider George Herriman to be the greatest of 20th century cartoonists. Leaping legumes!

Lot 70George Herriman1880-1944x
xJumping beans get their revenge on Offisa Pupp.x
xSunday comic strip, “Krazy Kat”, August 22, 1943;
Pen & ink, 22.25 x 14.5", not signed
x
xEstimate: $12,000 - 15,000x
xx
xCondition - Good overall: mat and frame are from Graham Gallery.




“Krazy Kat” detail, August 22, 1943


My most recent post on George Herriman's Krazy Kat can be read here.

0162

Saturday, December 3, 2011

Eyvind Earle Concept Paintings for Sleeping Beauty

Eyvind Earle was the artist most responsible for the unique, stylized look of Walt Disney's Sleeping Beauty (1959).  Two of his concept paintings for the feature production will be sold at Bonhams on December 14.


Sale 19431 - Entertainment Memorabilia including Animation Art, 14 Dec 2011
California, Los Angeles
 
Lot No: 4390

An Eyvind Earle concept painting from Sleeping Beauty
1959, watercolor on board, depicting Maleificent as a dragon behind the castle walls, signed lower right Eyvind Earle.

The Disney Studio hired Eyvind Earle in 1951. Within two years, he became the color stylist and inspirational artist for Sleeping Beauty. His artistic style, derived from medieval tapestries based on paintings by Durer and Breughal, had a large impact on the look of the characters and backgrounds. Many of the artists working on this film thought his style was a bit austere for this film, but Walt Disney thought otherwise.
6 1/8 x 14in

Estimate: US$7,000 - 9,000 

December 14, 2011:  Sold for US$8,125 inclusive of Buyer's Premium


http://www.bonhams.com/eur/auction/19431/lot/4390/




Lot No: 4391
An Eyvind Earle concept painting from Sleeping Beauty
1959, watercolor on board, depicting the evil Maleficient standing on the balcony beneath an arch of the castle with the sun setting in the background, signed lower right Eyvind Earle.
6 1/8 x 14in

Estimate: US$7,000 - 9,000

December 14, 2011:  Sold for US$8,125 inclusive of Buyer's Premium


http://www.bonhams.com/eur/auction/19431/lot/4391/





Here are a few more concept paintings for Sleeping Beauty by Eyvind Earle:







Note:  These and many more can be seen at http://artofdisneyeng.canalblog.com/

My own most recent Disney post is here.


161

Friday, December 2, 2011

James Gurney's Museum of High and Low Art

I got to meet illustrator and author James Gurney (Dinotopia, Imaginative Realism) and his wife Jeanette at Books of Wonder in New York on Saturday and it was a really great experience. Books of Wonder had assembled an amazing panel of first-rate illustrators. I generally don't attend too many book signings, but I'm delighted I went to this one. Gurney was promoting the 20th anniversary edition of Dinotopia.


Given the number of sequels that have been published and the well-deserved fame of the series, I was surprised to learn that the original book had gone out of print. How could such a thing happen? Well, the classic volume is back in print now, and a good value. Gurney took the time to personalize each book for those who purchased a copy, and he graciously included a neat drawing of a dinosaur without being asked. I'm not so easily impressed at these events, but I was impressed here.

Shown below is the drawing he made for me. As he described it, it's an art museum for dinosaurs and humans which showcases, literally, both high art and low art! (I said I didn't acknowledge that distinction. He said he felt the same way.)

James Gurney, Dinotopian Museum of High Art and Low Art, Books of Wonder, November 26, 2011

Even if he's made this little variant of the drawing a dozen times or more, I'm quite impressed. For one thing, Gurney had spoken with me for only a couple of minutes, yet he came up with a drawing that was outstandingly well-suited to me. I mean, I like to think I'm not that easy to read. Of course, I shouldn't really be surprised by his acumen. To be sure, this particular drawing might sit well with any professional of my age eager to take some time out of his busy day to hobnob with illustrators. As a passionate fan, I belong to an unusual "type" that illustrators could use a lot more of.

The really odd thing, though, is that this drawing says a lot not only about me, but about my blog. How can that be? Is it because this blog is such a good reflection of me? Certainly there was no way Gurney could have known I even have a blog, let alone such an unconventional one as this. Yet this drawing, by making a comically artificial distinction between high and low art, somehow gets at the very essence of what this whole blog of mine is about more succinctly than anything I myself have ever articulated here. How about that?  Not a bad thing to come out of a book signing! It's almost as if I've been given a raison d'etre now!

Look, at too many book signings, the purchaser walks away with a book he's paid full price for containing an  author's indifferent signature. Sure, some signatures are wonderfully distinctive in themselves, but many are hastily scribbled, almost illegible. In the future, if someone should question the signature, it's often hard to prove authenticity, and this might be a part of the reason for the proliferation of digital photos taken at book signings, although this recent phenomenon is also partially about having an additional souvenir of meeting the author, one that doesn't entail additional expenditure. 

Here's my point: if you admire an author for his literary craftsmanship, a few personalized words inscribed along with the author's signature can mean so much more than an automatic hurried scrawl. With artists, naturally, it's the artwork that draws us to them. A small drawing or even a doodle usually gets closer to the essence of what we admire about the artist than the signature itself . Book signings can create an assembly-line atmosphere, particularly if a large crowd of buyers shows up or if the booksellers bring out a few dozen volumes for the author to sign for future sale. Someone like James Gurney being willing to take some time and to give some thought to each visitor makes a huge difference. 

Gurney, as I have since learned, makes a variety of different dinosaur drawings for his fans, many of them based on a right-facing Apatosaurus, or what I still think of as a Brontosaurus just as I still think of Pluto as the ninth planet. Gurney is right-handed, which should make a left-facing profile easier, one would think. 

Below is an example posted by Giovanni Zagaria on the Comic Art Fans page of a convention drawing similar to mine. It was drawn at Lucca Comics and Games in 2010 in Italy. Here the museum is open-air, necessitated by an error in the dedication, deliberately obscured. A light wash is applied to provide some shading, adding to the three-dimensional form. It's really quite graceful.

http://www.comicartfans.com/GalleryPiece.asp?Piece=694368&GSub=79039


November 3, 2012 Update:  Books of Wonder has launched a campaign to "revitalize, refurbish, and renew." Two images by James Gurney are being used in this promotion.


James Gurney, Dedicated "To My Friends at Books of Wonder," November 26, 2011.
Look familiar? This drawing, made on the same day I was at the bookstore but more elaborate, has been enlisted with the artist's permission in the campaign to help revitalize Books of Wonder after the loss of its cupcake-baking subtenants. The splendid image is included in a series of 85 postcards specially-produced for the campaign. You can get a copy with a contribution.
Image added November 3, 2012


James Gurney, "I Devour Books." Dedicated "To People
and Dinosaurs
 Who Shop at Books of Wonder."
This drawing may have been created specifically for the campaign to help revitalize Books of Wonder after the loss of its bakery subtenants. The bold image is one of two by Mr. Gurney included in the series of 85 postcards specially-produced for the campaign.
Image added November 3, 2012


[End of November 3, 2012 Update: ]


Here's an example of a James Gurney Apatosaurus in blue ink without a gag and without a dedication. I found this copy of Dinotopia:  Journey to Chandara for sale at a West Coast bookseller while researching this post and soon after added it to my own collection. Why not?:
James Gurney, Apatosaurus in Dinotopia:  Journey to Chandara (2007)
http://www.klinebooks.com/cgi-bin/kline/27064



Finally, I have never before posted my own drawings anywhere but, by way of extreme contrast, if you want to understand why James Gurney is a world-class illustrator and I, for one, am not, take a look at the birth announcement I drew some years ago which currently serves as my profile picture. I think you'll agree that my conception of dinosaur anatomy is the very opposite of realism, imaginative or otherwise. I mean, just what species are these supposed to be?

Prehistoric Birth Announcement



Note:  James Gurney appears in my New York is Book Country post here with a poster that's quite literally an example of high art.

Melissa Sweet was also at Books of Wonder. See my copy of her Balloons Over Broadway here.  Her balloons are high art too!

There are no previous posts here with my own drawings. That's probably a good thing....

0160

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Book Review: Catching Fire (2009) by Suzanne Collins

Catching Fire (2009)
Suzanne Collins

Catching Fire is the second book in Suzanne Collins's The Hunger Games Trilogy. It's still pretty good, but it just isn't the page-turner that The Hunger Games is. Part of the problem is familiarity. We've already witnessed Katniss's confusion over her feelings for the two young men in her life, Gale and Peeta. Whatever seeming resolution there may have been at the end of the first book, we're back to square one now. Yes, here we go again...

Also, we already understand the structure of the Hunger Games, so when the 75th annual event rolls around, we think we know what to expect. Actually, we don't. First off, it's a Quarter Quell, which happens only once every 25 years and in this instance involves a severe alteration in the rules for the tribute pool at the reaping. There's a world of difference in these Hunger Games, with everything meant to be more chilling this time around. But how can the Hunger Games possibly be more chilling than the orgy of child killing we've already seen? As the twelve districts break out in scattered uprisings, the Capitol makes sure the games become even more cruel. This requires Collins to keep topping herself. She acquits herself admirably, but eventually you get the sense that no matter how hopeless it gets, the book's main characters are not about to die en masse. Things are meant to look awfully bleak here, but I sense there is definitely still some hope for Katniss to survive the climactic third book without losing too many of her loved ones.


Note:  If you missed it, my brief book review of The Hunger Games is here.

0159