Showing posts with label Morticia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Morticia. Show all posts

Monday, May 11, 2026

Glenn Shea's Copy of Nightcrawlers by Charles Addams

No doubt there is a story behind a copy of the cartoon collection Nightcrawlers (1957) which was signed by Charles Addams in 1973, some sixteen years after publication. It is inscribed by the artist to Glenn Shea with a "large" drawing of Morticia, who is tall and thin enough to dominate a page.




Charles Addams
AbeBooks listing accessed May 10, 2026


Charles Addams
AbeBooks item description 



Image added May 16, 2026




05262

Tuesday, August 5, 2025

The First Addams Family Dolls

Wednesday's child is full of woe
—"Monday's Child"


I've written it here many times over the years when discussing Charles Addams: Although the Addams Family characters we are so familiar with today had their published origin in The New Yorker in 1938, these family members themselves weren't given proper names until the appearance of the television show in 1964. These are no doubt wise and well-considered words of mine—if only they were correct!


Wednesday, the morbidly-inclined Addams Family girl, actually received her name three years before the TV series. She is named for the day of the week in the nursery rhyme on which a child is born "full of woe."


The New York Times announced the appearance of a Wednesday doll on August 11, 1961. In a short article titled "Cartoon Child Called Wednesday is Recreated as Woeful Rag Doll," readers learned that the Addams doll would be available in early September at Brentano's and Doubleday, leading area bookstores.


The New York Times, August 11, 1961, p. 14


A few of these dolls are still around. They originally retailed for $7.98 and were created by Aboriginals, Ltd. Some color photos of the 1961 Wednesday doll, 22" high, taken from eBay are now archived on Worthpoint:






The Times article also hints at a doll under development featuring Wednesday's brother, the as yet unnamed Addams Family boy. Today we all call him Pugsley but Addams, we know, wanted to name him Pubert. In the Times, he is just "Addams' little blond boy who keeps reptiles as pets."


The 20" doll was to be issued in 1962, again by Aboriginals, Ltd., marketed under the name Irving—in retrospect maybe not the best choice. An example of the Irving doll was sold at Hake's in 2022 for $1,667.93 including the buyer's premium:




And what of their mother—Morticia, you say? Also issued in 1962, the 48" doll was given her familiar modern name and sold for $19.95. A fine example, again offered at auction by Hake's, sold in 2016 for $3,921.50:










Note:  Season 2 of "Wednesday" premieres tomorrow on Netflix.







05023

Friday, January 12, 2024

The Art of the Redraw: The Addams Family Children Back From Camp

We now come to the third and final redrawn New Yorker cartoon by Charles Addams that came to light three years ago when offered for sale at an auction house in Penzance. Like the two we have already seen, this one features characters we today recognize as the Addams Family. The original drawing was published in The New Yorker of August 30, 1947.

"It's the children, darling—back from camp."
Charles Addams
The New Yorker,
 August 30, 1947, page 20


A cartoon by Charles Addams and a spot drawing of a street corner by "h"


As luck would have it, I have already posted the original published art here:

"It's the children, darling, back from camp."
Charles Addams
Original art
Published as "It's the children, darling—back from camp."
The New Yorker, August 30, 1947, page 20

And now let's have a look at that redraw:
"It's the children, darling, back from camp."
Charles Addams
Redraw after
The New Yorker, August 30, 1947, page 20


The redraw suffers a bit from foxing outside the image. The board is 76 x 56 cm with a lot of white area around the drawing, whereas the New Yorker original from Christie's is only 40.6 x 30.5 cm. The redrawn caption is in capital letters while the original is in cursive. Could these differences be because the original is intended solely for reproduction while the redraw is intended for display? Interestingly, both captions are written with two commas, but The New Yorker substitutes a dash for the second comma, giving the punchline more punch.

Here is Gomez in the original and then in the redraw:
Original



Redraw

Addams has moved the torn curtain to the left to better frame Gomez against a dark backdrop. His nose is drawn differently. The banisters are less tapered in the redraw. In fact, many of the details seem less carefully rendered and shaded.

Thing lurks above:
Original

Redraw

Again, some of the exquisite subtleties seem lost in the redraw.

Lurch stands at the ready:
Original

Redraw

The redraw doesn't have the same attention to detail. Compare the feather duster, the steps, the floorboards, Lurch.

Finally, there is the quadrant with Morticia, the driver, Wednesday, and Pugsley, the visual payoff for the cartoon:
Original

Redraw


Once again, the redraw is splendid, but there is more care given to the original.

The David Lay auction continues:
"It's the children, darling, back from camp."
Charles Addams
Redraw after
The New Yorker, August 30, 1947, page 20

Verso of Whatman drawing board

Signature of Chas Addams

"It's the children, darling, back from camp."
Charles Addams
Redraw after
The New Yorker, August 30, 1947, page 20

Handwritten caption  in capital letters

"It's the children, darling, back from camp."
Charles Addams
Redraw after
The New Yorker, August 30, 1947, page 20

Verso label

Verso

Detail of Lurch, Morticia, driver, Wednesday, and Pugsley

Detail of Gomez

Charles Addams
Lay's Auctioneers Fine Art Sale of January 29, 2021

The three Addams redraws in the virtual Fine Art Sale
Lot 583:  Redraw of January 24, 1948                     Lot 582:  Redraw of August 30, 1947                    Lot 581:  Redraw of November 25, 1939


And there you have it. If the three redraws were commissioned together, as seems probable, their dates would have to be after January 24, 1948. We are told they were obtained in London the late 1940s.



Note:  I wish once again to thank the reader who informed me of this sale. I apologize for taking three years to report on it.

Are there any more Charles Addams redraws out there? Your blogger wants to know.

These newsworthy Addams finds were covered in the Daily Mail here.

* * *

The artist who signed the New Yorker spot drawing opposite the Addams cartoon with an "h" is unknown to me. Can anyone help me out?
"h"
Spot drawing of a street corner

The New Yorker, August 30, 1947, page 21




04555

Wednesday, January 10, 2024

The Art of the Redraw: Morticia and Lurch by Charles Addams

Three previously-unknown redraws of New Yorker cartoons by Charles Addams came to light when they were brought to auction early in 2021. One of them has the character we know today as Lurch bringing the one we call Morticia her tea. (Addams Family characters were not assigned names until the 1964 television series a full quarter century after this drawing was published.) There is a broken table lamp that serves as a single light source, allowing the two figures to be front lit while casting dark shadows behind them. Addams in 1939 was already a master of architectural detail, presenting it in a state of dilapidation to enhance the gothic, spooky atmosphere.

"Oh, it's you!  For a moment you gave me quite a start."
Charles Addams
The New Yorker, November 25, 1939, p. 16

A cartoon by Charles Addams and a spot drawing by Roger Duvoisin

The cartoon was also to appear in Drawn and Quartered (1942), Addams's first collection:

https://thecarycollection.com/products/drawn-and-quartered-1942-addams-chas

It was later used on the cover of the first revised paperback edition published by Pocket Books (1964):



There was a published print with the caption printed in Addams's hand from his original:

https://www.ebay.ca/itm/153076797703



The redraw of this cartoon was made no later than the late 1940s. There are some noteworthy differences from the New Yorker drawing, particularly the peering presence of Thing, above. It was sold at auction in early 2021 for a hammer price of 5500 GBP.

"Oh, it's you!  For a moment you gave me quite a start."
Charles Addams
Redraw after
The New Yorker, November 25, 1939, p. 16

"Oh, it's you!  For a moment you gave me quite a start."
Charles Addams
Redraw after
The New Yorker, November 25, 1939, p. 16

"Oh, it's you!  For a moment you gave me quite a start."
Charles Addams
Redraw after
The New Yorker, November 25, 1939, p. 16

Chas Addams's signature is on the left, not the right, in the redraw. It is also a later signature than seen in the 1939 example.

Detail of Thing peering down from above. Thing is not to be found in the New Yorker drawing, although the ceiling panel is there.

Detail with foxing

Verso

Detail of verso

The handwritten caption is in all capital letters. Is it in Addams's hand?

Detail of Morticia and Lurch

"Oh, it's you!  For a moment you gave me quite a start."
Charles Addams
Redraw after
The New Yorker, November 25, 1939, p. 16

Charles Addams
Lay's Auctioneers Fine Art Sale of January 29, 2021


Here they are, published drawing and redraw, presented together for comparison:

"Oh, it's you!  For a moment you gave me quite a start."
Charles Addams
The New Yorker, November 25, 1939, p. 16

"Oh, it's you!  For a moment you gave me quite a start."
Charles Addams
Redraw after
The New Yorker, November 25, 1939, p. 16




Note:  I wish again to thank the uncredited individual who told me of this sale back when it happened. You know who you are.


* * *

Finally, we have a bonus for tree lovers from the New Yorker page opposite the Addams cartoon:
Tree Movers
Spot drawing
Roger Duvoisin
The New Yorker, November 25, 1939, p. 17




04554