Showing posts with label Forgery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Forgery. Show all posts

Saturday, January 6, 2024

On the Proliferation of Fake Collectors' Stamps

Comic art and illustration specialist Murray A. Harris of California often annotated the back, or verso, of works in his collection, adding his personal stamp and signature. Here's an example of his markings on the back of a Reamer Keller drawing selected from the blog archives. It is stamped twice indicating two different Harris addresses, signed once, and date stamped, either indicating a date of publication or of acquisition:
https://attemptedbloggery.blogspot.com/2020/06/reamer-keller-no-rest-for-grownups.html


Many collectors must be familiar with Harris because of such documentary practices. It is gratifying to know something about the provenance of a drawing, particularly if it once resided in a well-regarded collection.

A work on paper from the Zipriani Auction House of Lima raises some questions in this area. It was listed this past March as "Saul Steinberg Drawing on Paper (In The Style Of)." In auction speak, that's tantamount to an admission that it is not an original drawing by Saul Steinberg, or that its authorship cannot be proved, but to my eye it is still fairly impressive. The original $1,200 asking price is a bit of a head-scratcher; too low for a true Steinberg original of this quality but too high for a mere copy.

Adding to the puzzle, the drawing has a Harris collection stamp on the verso. It is poorly inked unlike the Keller example above, and there is no corresponding Harris signature or other marking. Could this doubtful Steinberg have resided in Harris's collection? Or is the stamp itself a fake, meant to suggest provenance and thus authenticity to the knowing collector when in fact there is neither? Harris's name was in bold text on the verso of the Keller drawing; here it is clearly a different stamp with the same text.

At any rate, the lot did not find a buyer. The price was soon reduced to an opening bid of $400, and later to $100—not true Steinberg territory.
Saul Steinberg
Zipriani Auction House listing accessed March 7, 2023
https://www.liveauctioneers.com/item/147198975_saul-steinberg-drawing-on-paper-in-the-style-of?from=alert&utm_source=SavedAlert&utm_campaign=SearchAlert_20200423_A&utm_medium=email&utm_content=item

In the style of Saul Steinberg
Zipriani Auction House listing accessed March 7, 2023



The version of Steinberg's New Yorker drawing from the issue of February 3, 1945 is distinct from that published in his later 1945 collection All In Line. In fact, his New Yorker and his All In Line drawings differ in a great many ways (see, for example, the head at the lower left, left-facing in one and right-facing in the other), something one might readily expect from a series of freehand variations on a theme this complex.


Saul Steinberg
The New Yorker, February 3, 1945, p. 22

Saul Steinberg
All In Line,
1945


The Zipriani drawing is close to the better-known All In Line version, but it is by no means identical. So the question is, would Steinberg do such a slavish redrawing of his own work, certainly not his usual practice, or is it a reasonable good copy by someone else perhaps made with a light box? Then again, could Steinberg himself be closely copying over his own work to try to get everything just right for the book version? 
In the style of Saul Steinberg

The final nail in the coffin, I believe, of the Zipriani drawing's authenticity is the company it keeps. Most every piece in the March sale was also described as "in the style of . . . "

Something fishy is apparently going on down in Peru. A comic panel by R. Crumb from HUP #3 (1989) features a noted real estate developer. The variety of hatching, cross-hatching, line quality, and lettering present a challenge to a potential copyist quite distinct from the clean lines of the Steinberg.
https://twitter.com/richard_littler/status/1290922254654672896

A drawing currently for sale on eBay is listed as "Robert Crumb Drawing on paper (Handmade) signed and stamped mixed media vtg art." It is not at all convincing as a Crumb original, particularly when compared with the published HUP panel, and the original is probably a full comic page anyway. The $115 or best offer price should be seen as a tacit acknowledgment of this. The seller, probably not coincidentally, is located in Lima.

The verso is telling as well for the presence of no fewer than five collectors' stamps! Honestly, if one stamp is good, are five better? At the bottom left is yet a third Harris stamp, not the one on the Keller or the Zipriani Auction piece. If that's not convincing enough, there's a Museum of Modern Art stamp at the lower right. Talk about your jaw-dropping provenances!

eBay listing accessed January 5, 2024


eBay item description




Peru then may very well have a workshop churning out copies of drawings, some better than others, and decorating the versos with copies of collectors' stamps including Harris's. As always, caveat emptor.


Note:  I wish to thank cartoonist Michael Maslin and writer Steve Stoliar for helping me to decipher the Zipriani Auction piece. It's taken me the better part of a year to come to my present understanding of it.

"Will you be my wives?"
Otto Soglow
The New Yorker, February 3, 1945, p. 23








04550

Saturday, April 1, 2023

Ronald Searle: Loquacious Parrot

The full title is Loquacious Parrot Convinced That It is Teaching Man a Basic Vocabulary. Ronald Searle's talkative bird is grand and grotesque, sitting on its perch and pontificating with a wide-open beak. Forum Auctions of London just listed a work of original Searle art, a variant of the original book illustration from The King of Beasts & Other Creatures (Allen Lane, London, 1980) or, for American readers, The Situation is Hopeless (Viking Press, New York, 1981). It shows Searle's characteristic baroque technique complete with controlled ink splotches. The presale estimate was 800 to 1,200 GBP with a starting bid of 550 GBP, fairly low for a fully-realized watercolor drawing by this cartoon master.


Ronald Searle
Forum Auctions—UK listing accessed March 12, 2023

March 30, 2023, Lot 467



Ronald Searle
Forum Auctions—UK item description



April Fools!

Oh, for crying out loud! This atrocious copy could never pass for the work of Ronald Searle. Forum Auctions, which should not have listed it, withdrew the work at least a week prior to the sale.




Anyone trying to pass off a Searle forgery faces at least three serious problems. The first is Searle's masterful technique with pen, ink, and watercolor. Good luck copying that. The second is Searle's distinctive left-handed signature. I don't think I've ever seen a good counterfeit of it, especially after it became more horizontal in 1970 or so. The Forum Auctions drawing is copied directly from the book illustration freehand, it would seem. Its deficiencies are pretty 
obvious when you also have the real deal in front of you:
Loquacious parrot convinced that it is teaching man a basic vocabulary
Ronald Searle
The King of Beasts & Other Creatures, 1980

https://www.ebay.com/itm/192114458300?hash=item2cbae9febc:g:VMAAAOSwSlBYsxRH&amdata=enc%3AAQAHAAAA8IxV%2FyGuRuTdnb4dMUxYHpw4tGYoKeKeW1
jBRz9b5eWrQW4zs0ItpdXSwy8bHUrQR%2BWIk8vW7Cq5vlQnJF5nngeWvwpsgJYj71c%2F9PuOSIhoNOcX4YU%2BYRT1J8H6Q3F3XnH%2FR9M4qmVD7sjuL
QELVx0Thl0JYrLe6oV7XxKOwwFBGdgop9BNftFx5KwJTxLWfhx2ehfxe15hAI5Zvrzv28Y%2B38K5mfaSnWVQbIokhIUkD3x8%2BEdr1qxvA%2F
Lcxa5v27Xwo1pUVAOEaBUJ6ZS0728L0JngApvNPtU9ST3s4bqiXei%2FhPPaVKYynLqK2kppMQ%3D%3D%7Ctkp%3ABk9SR8TrvqLnYQ




There is, in fact, a close variant of the original book illustration out there, one created by Searle himself in 1979. Here he set the perch at an angle and used a heavy horizon line. It too would have worked just fine in the book, but Searle preferred the other more basic
 version.

Ronald Searle
Christie's December 1, 2004


Ronald Searle
Christie's item description





The third significant problem for the forger is how to cash in on the high prices Searle's art fetches, particularly in the U.K. Spurious pieces like this one typically end up at smaller British auction houses and booksellers where the Searle name is known but the nuances of his art perhaps are not. Original Searle work often goes to Christie's or to the illustration dealer Chris Beetles. As we have seen, Searle's preliminary or variant art can be surprisingly close to his finishes. Once you're familiar with Searle's work, it's hard to not be repulsed by the work of an amateur copyist.
















04276

Tuesday, December 2, 2014

Would You Spend $1 Million on This?

Cases of art forgery are nothing new, unfortunately. The case of John Re in today's Times is remarkable though not only for its scope, but for the bizarre fact that he put about $1 million of his ill-gotten gains into a submarine! The vessel, which is called "Deep Quest," does not dive and may be no more than a "movie prop" refurbished at great cost. He used it as a "luxury houseboat."

Does it make any sense to sell fake art and use the proceeds to buy a fake submarine? Is there anyone reading this blog who could not have put the money to far better use?


http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/02/nyregion/seller-of-art-fakes-pleads-guilty-to-wire-fraud.html?_r=0

Note:  Forgery is the great scourge of the art market. Are there any forgeries on this blog? You tell me.

01358