Thursday, September 12, 2019

Peter Kingston: Putting Peter Arno in a Box

In 1992, Australian artist Peter Kingston (b. 1943) created a box construction based on a 1946 New Yorker cartoon by Peter Arno.
"This is Major Belknap, dear. He hasn't seen a white woman in three years." (1992)
Peter Kingston

Peter Kingston
Leonard Joel sale
November 21, 2010
Sydney, Australia



https://www.exchangerates.org.uk/USD-AUD-31_12_2010-exchange-rate-history.html

What could have prompted Kingston to take on this unusual project? Why did he choose this particular Arno cartoon? Although published in America early in the postwar period, it has something of a colonial British Empire feel to it with its antiquated racist and sexist assumptions. If one can get past all that, it is also very funny.

Cartoon by Peter Arno, spot by James Thurber

Kingston's box retains flat cutouts of the Arno characters with some muted color added. Arno has the characters closer together with the husband's hand in front of Major Belknap's back. In Kingston's construction, the characters stand farther apart; only the husband's finger is in front of the Major's back.

So which appears more three-dimensional, the two dimensional Arno or the three-dimensional box construction by Kingston?

"This is Major Belknap, dear. He hasn't seen a white woman in three years."
Peter Arno
The New Yorker, March 9, 1946, page 22



"This is Major Belknap, dear. He hasn't seen a white woman in three years." (1992)
Peter Kingston


Clearly it's the Arno. Arno has the front door audaciously opening into the room and the stairs ascending to the right in a three-quarter view. There is a hint of two-point perspective, but can those two foyer walls really be at right angles to each other? Does that right hand wall really run parallel to the wall in the hallway? Perhaps not. Possibly the stairs go up a curved wall. Whatever the case, Arno is engaged in some sort of convincing sleight-of-hand here. Kingston doesn't even try to open the front door into the room and he gives only a side view of the stairs. The walls still don't intersect at a plausible right angle. Perhaps it was Arno's placement of three characters standing in a single plane in a cramped but complex space that drew Kingston to this cartoon. Or perhaps he just thought it was funny.

Over the decades, Kingston has continued to create occasional constructions and these have gained greatly in technical sophistication. It would be interesting to see how the artist would handle a similar challenge to the Arno drawing today. But perhaps he has learned that Arno does not easily give up his secrets.
The Night Ferry (2014)
Peter Kingston
http://australiangalleries.com.au/exhibitions/peter-kingston-previous-exhibition-and-book-launch-rs14/


Note:  Michael Maslin, in his biography Peter Arno: The Mad, Mad World of the New Yorker's Greatest Cartoonist (2016), points out that it was this cartoon with which Peter Arno's "strike" against the New Yorker came to an end. See page 155 here.


Quick Links to the Attempted Bloggery Archives:

Peter Arno


Appropriation Art

The New Yorker


Attempted Bloggery's One-Dimensional Index

03033

Wednesday, September 11, 2019

The Cartoon Collections Caption Contest #40

Try not to stare at my entries in the Cartoon Collections Caption Contest #40. The drawing is by P. C. Vey.
"Relax. I'm low on batteries."
"My name is Rachel but people call me Ray."
"No worries. This thing hasn't worked all week."
"I lost two husbands to a software glitch."
"Why are men so intimidated by a powerful woman?"
"Go ahead, say I'm shrill."
"A penny for your thoughts, or should I just extract them?"
"I find it's a great conversation ender."




I could have entered these captions but didn't. Were they up to speed?
"I like you. Is there anyone here you'd like annihilated?"
"Actually, it dispenses mustard."
"Go ahead, make my ray."
"Watch out, buddy, the warranty is up."
"With great power comes a great electric bill."

September 18, 2019 Update:  The Winner
September 25, 2019 Update:  I see that Lawrence Wood, in his analysis of this contest, mentions my last two entries, a first.


Quick Links to the Attempted Bloggery Archives:




03032

Tuesday, September 10, 2019

Centerfold Missing: Playboy Signed by Ray Bradbury and Gahan Wilson

Someone took the trouble to take a copy of the January 1967 issue of Playboy and to have it signed by contributors Ray Bradbury and Gahan Wilson (in 1996, at least for Bradbury). Today that interesting copy comes to market on AbeBooks, but alas with the centerfold missing. The darn thing must have fallen out.


Playboy, January 1967
"No CF." Caveat emptor.

"When you're out of Schlitz, you're out of beer."
Back cover advertisement

"The Lost City of Mars" signed by Ray Bradbury on December 1, 1996

Tantalizing detail of published cartoon signed by Gahan Wilson but not dated

Ray Bradbury and Gahan Wilson
AbeBooks Listing Retrieved September 10, 2019



Well, that won't do. It's frustrating to glimpse just a fragment of a cartoon like that. Fortunately, we can get a better look at Gahan Wilson's full original artwork:
"You rang, sir?"
Gahan Wilson
Original art
Playboy, January 1967

Gahan Wilson
Swann Galleries
June 5, 2018, Sale 2480, Illustration Art, Lot 221


There, that's so much more satisfying. But what of the missing centerfold? Is there any way for us to get to see that? Well, of course there is. Playboy centerfolds are easily searchable on the internet. (The cartoons, not so much. Go figure.) On inspection the centerfold photograph from January 1967 looks highly doctored—see the suspicious curtain edge, for example—not to mention anatomically improbable, does it not? Well, no wonder it was removed from this copy of the magazine!
Surrey Marshe
Photo by Alexas Urba
Playboy, January 1967


Surrey Marshe, Miss January, was born Solveig Mellomborgen in Norway. She is the author of The Girl in the Centerfold, published in 1969 to no particular acclaim. She is now 71 and no longer contributes to the literary scene.

You can still buy the book on Amazon, though, where it is cleverly cross-marketed with a banner ad for "Essential school supplies!"
https://www.amazon.com/girl-centerfold-uninhibited-memoirs-January/dp/B0007HGWFI

Me, I'm waiting for the audiobook. Finally, for the benefit of those too young to remember the cultural importance of the Playboy centerfold in its heyday, this music video just may be of help:
"Centerfold"
J. Geils Band



Quick Links to the Attempted Bloggery 
Archives:


Ray Bradbury


Gahan Wilson

Playboy


Signed magazines


September 11


Attempted Bloggery's Staple-Free Index


03031

Monday, September 9, 2019

My Entry in the New Yorker Cartoon Caption Contest #676

My entry in the New Yorker Cartoon Caption Contest #676 for the issue of September 2, 2019 is almost ready. The drawing is by Paul Karasik.


"Look, it takes a little longer for GMO."


These captions were underdone:
"Now you want non-GMO?"
"It will be ready when it's ready."
"For the last time, we're not having wings."
"But I am shaking a leg."




September 16, 2019 Update:  The Finalists


September 23, 2019 Update:
  I voted with Sydney.


September 30, 2019 Update:  The Winner


Note:  Last week cartoonist Charlie Hankin took us to a cocktail party that was out of this world. Grab your drink and head over to Contest #675.



Quick Links to the Attempted Bloggery Archives:

Sunday, September 8, 2019

Karl Haendel: New Yorker Cartoon Drawing #9

Artists who appropriate other artist's images don't just copy them. They transform the images in a meaningful way. There are any number of ways in which this may be achieved and many decisions to make along the way. The artist first must choose an image to appropriate. Karl Haendel, for his series of New Yorker Cartoon Drawings, has a wealth of images to choose from. For his New Yorker Cartoon Drawing #9, he chose one by cartoonist David Sipress.
Karl Haendel
New Yorker Cartoon Drawing #9 (2004)

The Sipress cartoon was published in the same year as Haendel made his drawing. 
"Bad dog."
David Sipress
The New Yorker, April 19, 2004, page 169


The carefully-rendered caption makes it clear that Haendel's subject matter is the cartoon as it appears in print on the page of the New Yorker. Haendel's drawing differs from the published Sipress cartoon in at least three fundamental ways: it is reproduced by hand, it is much larger, and the medium is graphite. In this way it is decontextualized from the magazine page and is presented as an art object on the wall. It is an irony of this process that when Haendel's work is reproduced in a printed catalogue or onscreen, it becomes more like the mass-produced magazine cartoon that served as its original source.

https://www.phillips.com/detail/karl-haendel/NY010610/348

https://archives.newyorker.com/?i=2004-04-19#folio=168






Quick Links to the Attempted Bloggery 
Archives:


Appropriation Art


David Sipress

The New Yorker


September 11


Attempted Bloggery's Never-Appropriate Index


03029

Saturday, September 7, 2019

Karl Haendel: New Yorker Cartoon Drawing #6

We begin with a classic full page New Yorker cartoon by Warren Miller that was published in the magazine in 1974:
"Sam, it's the most sensitive thing you've ever done!"
Warren Miller
The New Yorker, June 17, 1974, page 29


American artist Karl Haendel was born two years after this cartoon was first published. In 2004 he appropriated the cartoon for his New Yorker Cartoon Drawing #6. That's right, #6:
New Yorker Cartoon Drawing #6 (2004)
Karl Haendel


The title acknowledges the source material for the drawing, which would be obvious in this case even if it didn't.  The drawing is quite large, 70" x 51", much larger than the printed page from which this drawing was appropriated and surely much larger than Miller's original cartoon. The medium is graphite which has a far different feel from the washes used by Miller. Haendel has copied the printed caption verbatim but he has not included a page number. Perhaps the image's source was not the original magazine but a book of collected cartoons.

Haendel may alter the images he appropriates in deliberate ways for satiric or artistic purposes. For the most part, this drawing seems to be faithful to its source. The meticulous use of graphite gives Haendel's work a very crisp and clean look compared with the darker wash tones of the original published cartoon. Miller's signature seems to have been rendered as MiVer, which leaves one wondering if Haendel knew the actual name of the cartoonist.

In its 2009 sale of this work, Christie's New York estimated the value at $6,000 to $8000. The hammer price was $5,250. This realized price is most likely higher than what Miller's original cartoon might fetch at auction, but again the present work is a much larger piece.
Karl Haendel
Christie's New York
Sale 2150, March 11, 2009

First Open Post-War and Contemporary Art
Lot 17







Quick Links to the Attempted Bloggery 
Archives:


Appropriation Art

Warren Miller

The New Yorker


September 11


Attempted Bloggery's Sensitive Index


03028

Friday, September 6, 2019

Duane Keiser: Coffee, Sun and The New Yorker

Artist Duane Keiser (b. 1966) uses eBay as a marketplace in which to sell his paintings. It's a great idea and I wish this business model worked for more artists. Coffee, Sun and The New Yorker is an 8" x 6" painting sold on eBay in 2016. We see a coffee cup but no coffee, sunlight but not the sun, and reading glasses over an open magazine that we are told is the New Yorker. One can make out the black and white columns of the magazine unbroken by spot drawings or cartoons.

Duane Keiser
Coffee, Sun and The New Yorker

Duane Keiser
eBay Listing Ended January 22, 2016

Duane Keiser
eBay Item Description

Duane Keiser
eBay Bid History
Seven bidders, fourteen bids. The last bidder gets it.






Quick Links to the Attempted Bloggery 
Archives:


The New Yorker


September 11


Attempted Bloggery's Sun-Drenched Index


03027

Thursday, September 5, 2019

Robert Karsten's Fake New Yorker Cover

York, Pennsylvania artist Robert Karsten (1943-1996) never had his work published on the cover of the New Yorker, but in 1962 while still a teenager he did the next best thing: he painted a fake New Yorker cover on illustration board. Complete with New Yorker magazine logo, date (October 23, 1962), and price (25 cents), the watercolor depicts a country scene with birds sitting on telephone lines and more birds in the air. It is not really convincing as a New Yorker cover. On artistic grounds, the painting is not particularly compelling. The proportions are too long, but despite this the image is entirely above the horizon line; in other words, the viewer is looking up. The strap that should typically appear along the left edge of the image is absent, although there may or may not be a faint watercolor hint of it. 

Could this have been submitted to the magazine as a proposed cover? It's possible, but the elaborate, hand-drawn logo would seem to be an odd way of going about that. More likely it's an artistic fantasy on a New Yorker cover.

The eBay seller suggests this painting depicts a scene from Alfred Hitchcock's "The Birds." As this movie classic wasn't released until 1963 and the painting lacks the requisite menace, that seems implausible.






Robert Karsten
eBay Listing Ended April 7, 2017

Robert Karsten
eBay Item Description

Robert Karsten
eBay Bid History
A single bidder avoids a potential bidding war by using Buy It Now.



What of the real New Yorker cover for that date? The actual magazine cover of October 13, 1962 is by Perry Barlow. It depicts a hurried player substitution between plays of a football game. The players seem very young so possibly it's a college football game we're seeing. It is raining. The loose painting technique captures the immediacy and the wetness of the moment. Barlow contrasts the energy of the players coming into the game in their fresh uniforms with the fatigue of the players coming to the sidelines covered in mud.
Perry Barlow
The New Yorker, October 13, 1962

There are no rules for what can and can't constitute a New Yorker cover, but it is useful to note that the Barlow cover conveys a specific point of view that's interesting even after we've seen hundreds of football games. Karsten's fake New Yorker cover, on the other hand, doesn't tell us much about birds sitting on telephone lines that we don't already know.
Robert Karsten
Fake New Yorker Cover, October 13, 1962




Quick Links to the Attempted Bloggery 
Archives:


Proposed New Yorker Cover Art


Perry Barlow

Football


Alfred Hitchcock

Attempted Bloggery's Freshly-Bleached Index


03026