Friday, January 20, 2012

Giulio Romano's Head of a Mother and Child

This fragment of a Renaissance cartoon featuring a Mother and Child from the tapestry The Massacre of the Innocents was executed in Raphael's Studio after the death of the master at the age of 37. It was Giulio Romano who most likely oversaw the studio's work on this cartoon. This preliminary study for a tapestry was later cut up, and individual fragments of the cartoon like this one became dispersed.

Studio of Raphael, Head of a Mother and Child






January 25, 2012:  Unsold




Studio of Raphael, Head of a Mother and Child
0211

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Book Review: Fall of Giants by Ken Follett


Fall of Giants (2010) by Ken Follett.



As a young man, Ken Follett wrote the extremely memorable spy novel Eye of the Needle in 1978. He has since gone on to write the highly-praised historical novel Pillars of the Earth and its sequel World Without End.

Follett's writing has grown more ambitious over the years, and now he has written Fall of Giants, a book of nearly 1,000 pages which is only the first of three projected volumes called The Century Trilogy. Fall of Giants follows eight major characters across three continents during the cataclysmic events of World War I, no minor feat. Subsequent volumes will follow the same characters and their descendants through the 20th Century. It seems clear that the second volume will cover the second World War. Perhaps the third volume will be set during the Cold War.

My knowledge of the First World War consists of hazy memories from high school social studies. Follett has done his homework here--he actually uses a research company based in New York--and he's made the earthshaking events of the early 20th Century seem as palpable as today's headlines. It's hard for a contemporary reader to understand how civilized nations could have subjected millions to the carnage of the first World War. Follett deals with this problem rather well. He places his characters close to the key decision-makers, so we can see firsthand how so many nations were led to such a calamitous outcome.

Follett's writing is very simple and direct. I would not characterize it as literary. He goes to great lengths to describe his characters's motivation for every decision and action. The cruelty and deprivation of life under the Czar is depicted so well that the Russian Revolution, when it finally comes, seems totally plausible, even necessary. Slowly, the horrors of life under Lenin emerge as well. This elaborate work of fiction depicts a host of complex historical events from the assassination of the Archduke Ferdinand to the Great Depression in convincing, even compelling, detail. President Wilson, the Kaiser, and Lenin all make their appearances, but they never overshadow the characters we care about.

To be sure, getting so much historical detail in a book with only eight primary characters requires a fair number of contrivances and coincidences. Characters get reassigned from the battlefield to military intelligence and back again, as the story requires. Characters may travel from country to country, but wherever they go they keep running into each other.

As in World Without End, Follett has a fondness for highly intelligent, highly competent young men and women with modern ideals. These are the good guys, the ones who passionately want peace or women's suffrage or safer coal mines, and who we hope will succeed. There are also a number of nationalistic or aristocratic characters wedded to Old World ideals and eager for war to advance their interests. Follett explains their positions, but he doesn't share them.



0210

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

A Charles Addams Tearjerker

Original drawings by Charles Addams come to the market fairly commonly, although the classic pieces related to the Addams Family seem to be well-ensconced in public and private collections. Heritage Auctions is offering a real find, a classic Charles Addams cartoon certain to be familiar to all his fans.  This is the most iconic Addams drawing I can recall being offered for sale anywhere.

The drawing has no caption. It depicts a theatre full of distraught moviegoers viewing the onscreen proceedings with tears and dread. But there is one notable exception.

The label on the back from Associated American Artists galleries names this piece Giggler in Movie, which seems to completely miss the point of Uncle Fester's perverse fascination with the morose storyline. Fester isn't merely giggling, he's exulting in the tragedy unfolding on screen. 

It looks as if the artwork once sold for $750, but I've no idea when. Anyway, there's no chance of that happening again. 













CHARLES SAMUEL ADDAMS (American, 1912-1988)
Sad Movie, 
New Yorker cartoon, March 23, 1946
Watercolor and ink with white wash on board
8.25 x 9.25 in.
Signed lower right

This beautiful watercolor represents one of the most memorable Addams Family originals to ever come onto the market. Addams' classic period of the 1940s saw the first appearance of many of his most famous cartoons featuring his hugely popular cast of characters, including Uncle Fester, the star of this uncaptioned gem. This iconically definitive example of the master's mordant wit has been reprinted numerous times, notably in Addams' second book collection, Addams and Evil (Simon and Schuster, 1947) and recently as the cover for Iain Topliss' The Comic Worlds of Peter Arno, William Steig, Charles Addams and Saul Steinberg (The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005). As author Topliss describes it: "Addams insisted that the captionless cartoon was the highest example of the comic art genre, and this is a brilliantly composed and maliciously conceived example" This masterpiece is the most important example by Addams we've ever offered and of the greatest, most historic images he ever created. Estimate: $12, 000 - $18,000
March 1, 2012 sale result




Addams, Charles Samuel:. American cartoonist, 1912-1988
Condition Report*:
Slight staining to white background; minor crease to lower left corner; tape residue on top edge; accretion on lower right corner; image in very good condition. Overall size of 12.25 x 14.75 inches.



Charles Addams
The New Yorker, March 23, 1946, page 31

Charles Addams
The New Yorker, March 23, 1946, page 31



March 14, 2012 Update:  The following auction wrap-up is exerpted from Artfix Daily's March 7 Artwire: 
A world record price was established for an original Charles Addams New Yorker Magazine cartoon as his Sad Movie, New Yorker magazine cartoon illustration, March 23, 1946 – one of the most famous of all Addams Family cartoons, soared amongst spirited bidding to the final price realized of $40,625, demolishing its pre-auction estimate of $12,000+ as well as the previous record of $16,100 for his art at auction.
“This beautiful watercolor is one of the most memorable Addams Family originals to ever come onto the market,” said Todd Hignite, Vice President at Heritage Auctions. “The uncaptioned image of Uncle Fester gleefully taking in a sad movie as the audience around him is reduced to tears is truly the definitive example of the master's mordant wit has been reprinted numerous times.”


A spot drawing by Roger Duvoisin and a cartoon by Charles Addams
Image added December 12, 2022


Roger Duvoisin
Spot drawing
Image added December 12, 2022




Note:  My last post about Charles Addams is here.


0209

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Picasso's Notre-Dame

Every tourist in Paris gets to see Notre-Dame, but few get to see it with Picasso's eyes. He shows us the familiar cathedral transformed with unexpectedly-inspired geometry, color, and atmospherics. The base of the cathedral is bathed in the Seine, while its towers are bathed in a pool of sky. The composition is busy and energetic, familiar and novel at the same time.

Bonhams New Bond Street is offering this oil painting in their Impressionist and Modern Art sale on February 7. The full auction listing:

Sale 19954 - Impressionist and Modern Art, 7 Feb 2012
London, New Bond Street
 

Lot No: 31AR

Pablo Picasso (1881-1973)
Notre-Dame de Paris 
dated '25.10.54.' (lower right)
oil on canvas
65.5 x 53.7cm (25 13/16 x 21 1/8in).
Painted on 25 October 1954

Estimate: £700,000 - 1,000,000, €840,000 - 1,200,000
February 7, 2012:  Sold for £864,450 inclusive of Buyer's Premium
Footnote:
PROVENANCE
Estate of the artist (no.13292).
Perls Galleries, New York.
Brook Street Gallery, London.
Private collection, Texas.
Collection Dobe, Zurich.
Anon. sale, Christie's New York, 13 May 1999, lot 499.

EXHIBITED
Paris, Grand Palais, Hommage Pablo Picasso, November 1966 - February 1967, no.236 (illustrated).
Zurich, Collection Dorbe, Urban Cityscapes, summer 1989.

LITERATURE
The Picasso Project, ed., Picasso's Paintings, Watercolours, Drawings and Sculpture: The Fifties I, 1950-1955, San Francisco, 2000, no.54-236 (a), p.242 (illustrated).

The authenticity of this work has kindly been confirmed by Madame Maya Widmaier-Picasso.


Landscapes played an integral role in Picasso's development as an artist, and his groundbreaking landscapes of 1909 marked the very beginnings of Cubism. They destroyed ideas of one-point perspective and manipulated senses of scale, light and shade, whilst communicating great sentiment. As a later work, Notre Dame de Paris illustrates the way in which Picasso used his early Cubist landscape techniques to influence his later landscape painting. Furthermore, and more symbolically, as Notre Dame de Paris is one of the very few landscape subjects painted by Picasso, it begs the question - why this subject at this time?

Picasso's early landscapes were influenced by Cézanne, whose paintings seemed to fuse the mountains and sky together in order to change viewer perspectives and flatten the dimensions of the landscape on the canvas. This complete blending of elements was crucial to Picasso's development of Cubism and is visible in this later painting.

Figure 1 depicts La rue des Paris, painted by the artist in the summer of 1908 and, as one of the very significant landscape works painted during Picasso's early Cubist phase, it acts as an interesting comparison with Notre Dame de Paris(painted much later). At first glance, the two works may seem to be completely different in approach, however there are key visual elements that remained constant throughout Picasso's landscape painting language. Firstly, the composition ofLa Rue des Paris appears to be split down the middle by the tree shown centre canvas. It acts as a separation between two areas of the subject – the linear, solid building to the left, and the fluid shading of nature to the right – whilst also acting as a focal point to create impact, and literally root the composition. Echoing that technique, Notre Dame de Paris depicts the Pont Saint-Michel bridge, which divides the composition into two areas. The area above the bridge is vigorous and curvilinear whilst the area below the bridge is more recognisably Cubist and geometric in its simplicity of shapes.

Secondly, both paintings raise more questions than provide visual answers; in La Rue des Paris the viewer seems to be looking at the tree from an elevated position whilst looking up at the building from below and there is no sense of perspective at all – the composition has been flattened by a complete subversion of scale and halting of the 'journey' that the viewer's eye takes through the painting. Again in Notre Dame de Paris, the sense of Picasso's viewpoint is multi-dimensional wherein the cathedral itself is viewed as if from the right bank, whilst the bridge is viewed as if standing on the left bank.

Picasso toys with the artistic conventions of perspective and scale to leave the viewer separated from reality and immersed instead into Picasso's own pictorial truth. Picasso certainly knew the Notre Dame landscape himself very well, via his walks to, and the view from, his studio, but chose to challenge it in order to explore aims other than realism.

It is possible that Picasso was pursuing special effects in his canvases that he had witnessed through using early cameras. It is well recorded that Picasso was interested in the effects of photography in regard to landscape painting. Undeniably, although Fauvist in style, Notre Dame de Paris, references the main themes the artist explored in his landscape photography and it is interesting to note which areas of this composition relate directly to his skill with the camera. The interlinking of the roofs of the Notre Dame with the curlicues of clouds echoes Picasso's intrigue with the way that foreground could merge with background in photography, and the way in which rooftops could merge into the sky (P.H. Tucker, Picasso, Photography and the Development of Cubism, The Art Bulletin, vol.64, no.2, 1982, p.295). In fact a description of one of Picasso's landscape photographs is familiar to both Notre Dame de Paris and La Rue de Paris:

'...this photograph bears evidence of the camera's ability to generalise. The left side of the curving reservoir wall fades into the landscape; the left side of the house in the foreground blends into the ground beside it...The light...seems to flicker across the surface in an arbitrary manner, minimising the different textures of the site and decreasing the sense of space in the picture.' (Ibid, p.295)

There is a far greater sense of contrast and vigour of light in Notre Dame de Paris than La rue de Paris but it is a painting that plays with luminosity just as his early Cubist works did. The light and shade on the Seine is reflected with sharp triangles of blues and whites underneath the Pont Saint-Michel, whilst heavily blackened shadows to the left and right of the composition close in the space and frame the central image of the cathedral.

The location of the landscapes that Picasso chose to paint were not coincidental but were places that he had emotional as well as geographical attachment to. For example, at the time of painting Notre Dame de Paris, he was spending a great deal of time in Vallauris and painted the surrounding French Riviera many times. He had also painted the Notre Dame before, most notably in the wake of the German occupation during the Second World War, and it was a work that expressed a poignant sense of liberation for the city that he knew and loved. In fact, the same degree of spiritual deliverance and freedom is notable in the present work, which is probably due to circumstances in his personal life at the time of painting.

By October 1954, when this painting was completed, the artist and his former partner, Françoise Gilot, had parted and he was falling in love with a woman who would later become his wife - Jacqueline Roque. Her portrait only appears in his paintings from May 1954, and at the time of painting Notre Dame de Paris, they were in the springtime of their passion, having recently returned from Vallauris together to live at his studio in Paris. Picasso's happiness at the time of working on this painting is self-evident. The vibrancy and impasto on the surface of the paint suggests Picasso's spirited movement as he painted the canvas, whilst positivity exudes from the subject itself. It is a painting depicting one day - marked '25.10.54' in the lower right of the painting - and as such, is a moment captured. It is as if it is a summer's day rather than a day in late October, and Picasso's new found love of Jacqueline and rediscovered love of Paris communicates beyond the picture plane.



http://www.bonhams.com/eur/auction/19954/lot/31/#



For comparison:
Pablo Picasso
Vue de Notre-Dame de Paris, 1945

Pablo Picasso
Vue de Notre-Dame de Paris 2, 1945
Pablo Picasso
Vue de Notre-Dame de Paris—Ile de la Cite, 1945




Note:  My previous Picasso post is here.

0208

Monday, January 16, 2012

Ronald Searle: "All in the Family" (1972)

Until Saturday, there have been no original drawings by Ronald Searle listed on eBay since I started this blog almost seven months ago. Now less than two weeks after his death was announced to the world, some original magazine art has been put up for sale. It is the original illustration art for the TV Guide cover of May 27, 1972, featuring caricatures of Caroll O'Connor and Jean Stapleton of "All in the Family." Has it really been forty years?

Anyway, the timing seems right to take advantage of all the recent attention to Searle's incredible legacy. Indeed, the artwork is already sold, for a Buy It Now price of $4,500, fewer than 24 hours after it was listed on Saturday. The price of $4,500 (plus $150 for shipping) is by no means trivial, but interest in Searle is especially keen right now, and magazine cover art, I suppose, can command a premium. It doesn't hurt that the subjects are still familiar to many of us after forty years. Nevertheless, I really didn't expect this to sell in less than a day! The seller's instincts were clearly very good, although he may now wish he had asked for more, or even tried a traditional auction format!

From the eBay listing:
Ronald Searle, Carroll O'Connor and Jean Stapleton of "All in the Family,"
TV Guide, May 27,1972




And so, less than 24 hours after this was listed, it was all over:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/390382239371?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2649#ht_793wt_1180


Carroll O'Connor, Jean Stapleton, and Sally Struthers backstage at the 1972 Emmy Awards.
 http://www.vcstar.com/photos/galleries/2011/oct/13/sally-struthers-stars-miss-hannigan-annie/30516/



June 1,  2013 Update:  It was announced today that actress Jean Stapleton has died at the age of 90. Carroll O'Connor passed away in 2001.

Note: You can see more of Searle's work for TV Guide at the Ronald Searle Tribute blog. My own previous post on Ronald Searle is here.

0207

Sunday, January 15, 2012

Action Comics #1

In June 1938, this was the book to buy: Action Comics No. 1!  Surely you know this comic book! Take a look at this listing from Heritage Auctions. Action Comics No. 1 is by Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster. It was the very first Superman comic book, and indeed, it told the story of the very first superhero, the Man of Steel

Sure I agree with Mr. Overstreet that this is "the most important comic book ever published." Here's my reasoning: without Action Comics No. 1, we don't have Superman. Without Superman, we don't have the modern superhero. Without the modern superhero, we have nothing to make movies about. Seriously, consider what I'm saying. Without the likes of Superman, Thor, the Green Lantern, the Avengers, Batman, the X-Men, Iron Man, the Fantastic Four, the Incredible Hulk, and Spider-Man what on earth would we be making movies about today? Relationships?




http://comics.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=7036&lotNo=91227

Saturday, January 14, 2012

Haddon Sundblom: All a Girl Needs

Haddon Sundblom was an illustrator who is still well known today for his Santa Claus advertising campaign for Coca-Cola. There were of course, many other aspects to his work as an artist. Here is an illustration of an emotionally difficult moment between a mother and daughter from 1942 for Ladies' Home Journal. Sundblom was careful painting faces and figures, but he resorted to a more painterly, impressionistic style in rendering the comforter and furniture in the light-dappled room.

The painting was just recently offered at Illustration House in their December 10 sale. Auction results still haven't been posted. I wonder what's going on over there.



Lot 35Haddon Sundblom1899-1976
Mother comforting teen daughter.
Story illustration: “All A Girl Needs”, Ladies’ Home Journal, August 1942, p. 20;
Oil on canvas, 29.75 x 22.5", signed lower left
Estimate: $12,000 - 18,000
Story title, date and page number and “J7917” written verso; also alternate title, date and page: “Butternut Jane June p. 23”
Condition - Very good overall: has light surface soil; framed.





Note:  My previous post on Haddon Sundblom, ...Talk About Being Good, is here.


0205

Friday, January 13, 2012

Two Black Hats

Today we'll look at two black wool hats from the auction market. There is nothing especially remarkable for these hats except for their provenance. The first black hat is a bowler from Sotheby's New York auction last month of Fine Books and Manuscripts. The accompanying typescript explains the history of Charlie Chaplin's hat, including Chaplin's being named in a paternity suit in 1909.

Charlie Chaplin, Bowler Hat




http://www.sothebys.com/en/catalogues/ecatalogue.html/2011/fine-books-manuscripts-n08811#/r=/en/ecat.fhtml.N08811.html+r.m=/en/ecat.lot.N08811.html/9/






The second black hat comes from the collection of Arnold Klein, M.D. As you probably recall, in 1984, while filming an ad for Pepsi, Michael Jackson's hair caught fire. He sustained second degree burns to his scalp which would come to cause him lifelong pain. According to Dr. Klein, this is the hat worn by Michael Jackson when he came home from the hospital after his initial treatment for this injury.


Sale 20105 - The Collection of Dr. Arnold Klein, 23 Jan 2012 California, Los Angeles 
Lot No: 1040
Michael Jackson-worn hat

Black wool with a thin black, wool band and a silver buckle.In 1984, at the top of his game, Pepsi hired Jackson and his brothers to perform in an elaborate commercial before a live audience. During the fireworks sequence, the singer was showered with sparks, alighting his hair. Jackson remained completely calm throughout, assuring his audience and fans that he was fine, although he suffered second-degree burns to his scalp, an injury that would cause him life-long pain.According to Dr. Klein, this hat was worn by Jackson as he left the hospital after receiving treatment. The doctor remained with the singer overnight in the hospital until he was able to return home and, as a gesture of gratitude, Jackson gave the hat to Dr. Klein.With an inscribed and signed note in Jackson's hand on "Michael Jackson/ Thriller" notepaper: "To: Dr. Klein From - Michael Jackson."Encased in plexiglas.
15 x 18 x 16 in (including plexiglas)

Estimate: US$7,000 - 10,000

The Chaplin bowler sold within it's estimate. Michael Jackson's hat will be sold on January 23. The estimate of $7,000 to $10,000 seems reasonable, I suppose, on the basis of the musician's phenomenal popularity. My question is, what are the odds of the Jackson hat selling for more than the Chaplin hat?

January 23, 2012 Update: Sales result: Unsold.

0204



Thursday, January 12, 2012

Amphigorey with an Original Gorey Drawing

Artists sometimes publish special limited editions of their more popular works, sometimes distinguished with special bindings or slipcases. These special editions often come with limitation pages on which the artist signs and numbers the book in ink. Because of the limited number of copies of the edition and their desirability, these books can be published with high production values and sold for a premium. Various other enhancements may be offered. Sometimes one or more limited-edition prints will be included. Sometimes images will be hand-colored. Even more exciting is the inclusion of an original drawing.

Amphigorey was Edward Gorey's 1972 volume collecting fifteen of his small books. The limited edition of fifty books each included a different original watercolor drawing signed by Mr. Gorey with his monogram. The number within the edition is included in the drawing, in this particular one in roman numerals, as well as on the colophon in arabic numerals. Drawings with watercolor such as this are evidently created in the artist's studio and are among the most finished examples that can be found in books. The drawing is laid in to the book. In 1974, the fifty different cat vignettes were collected in the book Categor y.

The rare book pictured here was sold at Swann Galleries on October 14, 2010. The hammer price of $8,000 ($9,600 with the 20% buyer's premium) far exceeded the $2,000-$3,000 presale estimate. In truth, that exceeds the price of many, but by no means all, Gorey drawings. The book, meant to be highly desirable forty years ago, is still highly desirable today.


Edward Gorey, original ink and watercolor drawing 
from the limited edition of Amphigorey, 34/50, 1972.


Sale 2225 Lot 198
SCARCE LIMITED EDITION WITH DRAWING GOREY, EDWARD. Amphigorey. Illustrated by Gorey. Tall 4to, pictorial boards; dust jacket; publisher's slipcase, moderate wear. first limited edition of gorey's wildly popular work. number 34 of only 50 copies signed by gorey with an original drawing. Toledano A44a. New York, 1972 
Estimate $2,000-3,000
Sold for $8,000



Irwin Terry, in his informative Goreyana blog, shares his own drawing from copy number 39 of the limited edition:
http://goreyana.blogspot.com/2009/04/amphigorey.html





Number 48, as reproduced in Categor y:

All fifty original cat drawings are collected in Categor y:
Categor y

203